Hi,
I would like to ask whether Starveri API is in scope for the OpenModels registry before preparing any data PR.
Starveri API is an independent OpenAI-compatible GPT/Codex API gateway. It is not affiliated with OpenAI. The public API exposes model and pricing metadata, and the buyer path uses prepaid credits.
Public references:
Potential provider shape:
id: starveri
name: Starveri API
description: Independent OpenAI-compatible GPT/Codex API gateway with public model metadata and prepaid credits.
api_base_url: https://api.starveri.net/v1
auth_type: bearer
compatibility: openai
The current public model IDs are:
gpt-5.5
gpt-5.4
gpt-5.4-mini
gpt-5.3-codex
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
gpt-5.1-codex
Pricing is published per 1M tokens and includes input, output, and cached-input prices. The /models endpoint also notes that context windows are subject to Codex-available limits.
Questions before a PR:
- Are independent OpenAI-compatible gateway providers in scope for OpenModels?
- Should Starveri
gpt-5.4, gpt-5.4-mini, and gpt-5.5 be mappings to the existing canonical model IDs, or should gateway-served models be represented separately?
- Should Starveri-specific
gpt-5.1-codex, gpt-5.3-codex, and gpt-5.3-codex-spark get new canonical model files first, or should they be omitted until there is a canonical upstream model definition?
- How should cached-input pricing map to the schema:
cache_read_per_million, or another field?
- For rate limits, should the mapping use the highest published paid tier, the default paid tier, or omit tier-specific limits if a single mapping cannot represent tiering?
- Should
context_window_override stay null until exact Starveri-specific token limits are published?
I am not providing an API key here and am not claiming OpenModels has tested Starveri end-to-end. If this is in scope, I can prepare a minimal PR using only the public docs and model metadata above.
Hi,
I would like to ask whether Starveri API is in scope for the OpenModels registry before preparing any data PR.
Starveri API is an independent OpenAI-compatible GPT/Codex API gateway. It is not affiliated with OpenAI. The public API exposes model and pricing metadata, and the buyer path uses prepaid credits.
Public references:
Potential provider shape:
The current public model IDs are:
gpt-5.5gpt-5.4gpt-5.4-minigpt-5.3-codexgpt-5.3-codex-sparkgpt-5.1-codexPricing is published per 1M tokens and includes input, output, and cached-input prices. The
/modelsendpoint also notes that context windows are subject to Codex-available limits.Questions before a PR:
gpt-5.4,gpt-5.4-mini, andgpt-5.5be mappings to the existing canonical model IDs, or should gateway-served models be represented separately?gpt-5.1-codex,gpt-5.3-codex, andgpt-5.3-codex-sparkget new canonical model files first, or should they be omitted until there is a canonical upstream model definition?cache_read_per_million, or another field?context_window_overridestaynulluntil exact Starveri-specific token limits are published?I am not providing an API key here and am not claiming OpenModels has tested Starveri end-to-end. If this is in scope, I can prepare a minimal PR using only the public docs and model metadata above.