Describe the bug
When a producer does not configure an explicit output.path in its webpack config, the type declarations archive (@mf-types.zip) and API file (@mf-types.d.ts) get written to a doubly-nested dist/dist/ folder inside the build output, instead of directly under the configured output directory (e.g. dist/@mf-types.zip).
This is made worse because mf-manifest.json's metaData.types.path field is always an empty string, regardless of this nesting — the manifest gives no indication that an extra dist subfolder needs to be prepended to locate the zip. As a consumer, resolving @mf-types.zip using the manifest's own types.path + types.zip fields leads to the wrong location and the type archive cannot be found, even though the manifest correctly names the file itself.
Expected behavior
The type declarations archive should be emitted at a single, predictable location under the compiler's output directory regardless of whether output.path is explicitly configured, and metaData.types.path should reflect that actual relative location so consumers can reliably resolve @mf-types.zip.
Workaround
With an explicit output.path set, the zip is emitted directly at the output root and this nesting doesn't occur — but nothing in the manifest signals when the extra directory is present versus not, since types.path is blank either way.
Reproduction
https://github.com/joeljoeljoel/webpack-mf-example
Used Package Manager
npm
System Info
System:
OS: macOS 26.5.1
CPU: (8) arm64 Apple M1
Memory: 97.39 MB / 16.00 GB
Shell: 5.9 - /bin/zsh
Binaries:
Node: 24.7.0 - /opt/homebrew/bin/node
npm: 11.5.1 - /opt/homebrew/bin/npm
Browsers:
Chrome: 145.0.7632.76
Safari: 26.5
Validations
Describe the bug
When a producer does not configure an explicit
output.pathin its webpack config, the type declarations archive (@mf-types.zip) and API file (@mf-types.d.ts) get written to a doubly-nested dist/dist/ folder inside the build output, instead of directly under the configured output directory (e.g. dist/@mf-types.zip).This is made worse because mf-manifest.json's
metaData.types.pathfield is always an empty string, regardless of this nesting — the manifest gives no indication that an extra dist subfolder needs to be prepended to locate the zip. As a consumer, resolving @mf-types.zip using the manifest's owntypes.path + types.zipfields leads to the wrong location and the type archive cannot be found, even though the manifest correctly names the file itself.Expected behavior
The type declarations archive should be emitted at a single, predictable location under the compiler's output directory regardless of whether
output.pathis explicitly configured, andmetaData.types.pathshould reflect that actual relative location so consumers can reliably resolve @mf-types.zip.Workaround
With an explicit
output.pathset, the zip is emitted directly at the output root and this nesting doesn't occur — but nothing in the manifest signals when the extra directory is present versus not, sincetypes.pathis blank either way.Reproduction
https://github.com/joeljoeljoel/webpack-mf-example
Used Package Manager
npm
System Info
System: OS: macOS 26.5.1 CPU: (8) arm64 Apple M1 Memory: 97.39 MB / 16.00 GB Shell: 5.9 - /bin/zsh Binaries: Node: 24.7.0 - /opt/homebrew/bin/node npm: 11.5.1 - /opt/homebrew/bin/npm Browsers: Chrome: 145.0.7632.76 Safari: 26.5Validations