You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@@ -205,31 +205,29 @@ Planning-grade financing model anchored to country financial parameters from [`l
205
205
206
206
### Government commitment summary (budgetable)
207
207
208
-
Bottom line for next year's budget submission. Construction phase runs **years 1–10** (public equity drawdown + interest-only grace on repayable debt; grant disbursements are non-repayable); steady-state operation begins **year 11** and runs for **30 years** until the loans amortise.
208
+
Bottom line for next year's budget submission. Construction phase runs **years 1–10** (public equity drawdown + interest-only grace on repayable debt; no climate-development grant assumed); steady-state operation begins **year 11** and runs for **30 years** until the loans amortise.
209
209
210
210
| Phase | Annual gov / municipal commitment | Per resident / yr |
211
211
|---|---|---|
212
-
| Construction (years 1–10) |**$18 M / yr**| $18|
213
-
| Steady-state, low-ridership (year 11+) |**$12 M / yr**| $12|
214
-
| Steady-state, high-ridership (year 11+) |**$7.3 M / yr**| $7|
215
-
| Steady-state, operating-neutral revenue case |**$21 M / yr**| $21|
_Population basis: 1,000,000 (catchment per `lib/city-batches/world-sample.toml`). After year 40, debt service drops to zero; steady-state commitments below are net of any operating surplus applied to repayable-debt support. The operating-neutral case already covers steady-state OPEX from fares, station shops, and advertising. Low/high residual OPEX shortfall before debt is $0 k / yr → $0 k / yr; surplus applied to debt support is $8.4 M / yr → $13 M / yr._
220
+
_Population basis: 1,000,000 (city population per `lib/city-batches/world-sample.toml`). After year 40, debt service drops to zero; steady-state commitments below are net of any operating surplus applied to repayable-debt support. The operating-neutral case already covers steady-state OPEX from fares, station shops, and advertising. Low/high residual OPEX shortfall before debt is $5.2 M / yr → $0 k / yr; surplus applied to debt support is $0 k / yr → $5.9 M / yr._
221
221
222
222
### CAPEX funding stack
223
223
224
224
| Tranche | Share | Principal | Rate | Tenor | Annual debt service (post-grace) |
225
225
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
226
-
| Climate / development grant (non-repayable) | 40% | $367 M | — | — | — |
227
-
| Green concessional loan (World Bank / AfDB / ADB / GCF class) | 50% | $459 M | 2.0% | 40 y, 10 y grace | $21 M / yr |
228
-
| Sovereign / project bonds (fallback only) | 0% | $0 k | 13.0% | 40 y, 10 y grace | $0 k / yr |
229
-
| Government equity (no debt service) | 10% | $92 M | — | — | — |
230
-
|**Total**|**100%**|**$918 M**|||**$21 M / yr**|
226
+
| Green concessional loan | 80% | $735 M | 2.0% | 40 y, 10 y grace | $33 M / yr |
227
+
| Government equity (no debt service) | 20% | $184 M | — | — | — |
228
+
|**Total**|**100%**|**$918 M**|||**$33 M / yr**|
231
229
232
-
_During the 10-year grace period the public sponsor pays interest only on repayable debt — concessional loan $9.2 M / yr + fallback bonds $0 k / yr = **$9.2 M / yr** total. The $367 M grant tranche carries no repayment or coupon. Government equity is drawn across construction ($9.2 M / yr × 10 yr). Principal repayment begins in year 11 on a 30-year amortisation schedule._
230
+
_During the 10-year grace period the public sponsor pays interest only on repayable debt — green concessional loan $15 M / yr = **$15 M / yr** total. The base case assumes no climate-development grant. Government equity is drawn across construction ($18 M / yr × 10 yr). Principal repayment begins in year 11 on a 30-year amortisation schedule._
233
231
234
232
### Annual OPEX (steady state)
235
233
@@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ _During the 10-year grace period the public sponsor pays interest only on repaya
239
237
| Civil + station + depot maintenance | 2 % of fixed-asset CAPEX | $6.9 M |
240
238
| Residual train-control wayside maintenance | 5 % of residual signalling CAPEX | $145 k |
| Labour (430 FTE) | driverless roster: OCC/remote 65, station/platform 131, passenger service 51, fleet maintenance 70, infrastructure/energy 77, admin/training 36; no train drivers × country median × 12 × engineer-premium 1.4 | $795 k |
240
+
| Labour (423 FTE) | driverless roster: OCC/remote 65, station/platform 131, passenger service 44, fleet maintenance 70, infrastructure/energy 77, admin/training 36; no train drivers × country median × 12 × engineer-premium 1.4 | $782 k |
243
241
|**OPEX subtotal**||**$25 M / yr**|
244
242
245
243
_Annual service work: 30,378 scheduled train-km/day × 365 d/yr × 108% depot/deadhead factor = 12.0 M train-km / yr (35.9 M car-km / yr). On-site PV covers 33.4 GWh/yr and the dedicated solar plant adds 126.9 GWh/yr against 143.7 GWh/yr traction demand before residual grid/PPA top-up (0.0 GWh/yr). Driverless labour follows RFC 0015: train drivers are not counted, but OCC remote-assist, platform presence, passenger service, and fleet/energy maintenance scale with the larger service._
@@ -257,30 +255,64 @@ Country median monthly income: **$110 USD** (per [`lib/templates/country-finance
257
255
258
256
### Revenue & operating neutrality
259
257
260
-
Planning ridership bracket = daily active riders at 25-45% of catchment, converted to paid trips at 2 trips/rider/day and capped by practical service capacity (345,600 trips/day). Annual paid trips multiply daily paid trips by 365 service-days at the operating-neutral fare. The operating-neutral column solves annual paid trips so **farebox + station-shop leases + advertising = steady-state OPEX**. Gross post-grace repayable-debt service remains visible in the CAPEX funding stack, while any operating surplus is netted from the budgetable government support line.
258
+
Planning revenue is capacity-led: annual paid trips are calculated from practical daily service capacity (345,600 trips/day) × 365 service-days × capacity utilisation. The low/high bracket uses 50%–80% of that practical capacity. The operating-neutral column solves the capacity utilisation needed so **farebox + station-shop leases + advertising = steady-state OPEX**. Gross post-grace repayable-debt service remains visible in the CAPEX funding stack, while any operating surplus is netted from the budgetable government support line.
261
259
262
260
|| Low scenario | High scenario | Operating-neutral target |
| Gross repayable-debt service + residual OPEX subsidy | $21 M / yr | $21 M / yr |**$21 M / yr**|
277
-
| Operating surplus applied to debt support |-$8.4 M / yr | -$13 M / yr |**$0 k / yr**|
278
-
|**Net gov repayable-debt support + residual OPEX subsidy**| $12 M / yr | $7.3 M / yr |**$21 M / yr**|
279
-
| Operating surplus after OPEX (before debt support) | $8.4 M / yr | $13 M / yr | $0 / yr |
271
+
| Gross repayable-debt service + residual OPEX subsidy | $38 M / yr | $33 M / yr |**$33 M / yr**|
272
+
| Operating surplus applied to debt support |$0 k / yr | -$5.9 M / yr |**$0 k / yr**|
273
+
|**Net gov repayable-debt support + residual OPEX subsidy**| $38 M / yr | $27 M / yr |**$33 M / yr**|
274
+
| Operating surplus after OPEX (before debt support) | $0 k / yr | $5.9 M / yr | $0 / yr |
280
275
281
276
_Commercial-revenue assumptions: 5,576 m² of station shop/kiosk leases at $10/m²/month and 1,072 advertising boards at $77/board/month, with occupancy derates applied._
282
277
283
-
**Caveats:** The grant-first funding stack, the 8 % operating-neutral fare target, the 25-45% daily-active-rider bracket, and the station-commercial assumptions are project-level defaults. Real deployments will negotiate the capital split with financing institutions and tune fares, retail mix, advertising inventory, and service frequency iteratively from boarding data. Treat the numbers above as a first-iteration sanity check, not as a bid-ready financial close.
278
+
**Caveats:** The grant-free funding stack, the 8 % operating-neutral fare target, the 50%–80% capacity-utilisation bracket, and the station-commercial assumptions are project-level defaults. Real deployments will negotiate the capital split with financing institutions and tune fares, retail mix, advertising inventory, and service frequency iteratively from boarding data. Treat the numbers above as a first-iteration sanity check, not as a bid-ready financial close.
279
+
280
+
## Broad economic benefits (planning proxy)
281
+
282
+
This is a broad-benefit screen, not a bankable benefit-cost analysis. The rows quantify useful channels for discussion — travel time, road externalities, access to essential services, station-area activity, and local CAPEX recirculation — but some channels overlap and should not be treated as audited fiscal revenue. Assumptions are loaded from [`lib/templates/economic-benefits.toml`](../../../../lib/templates/economic-benefits.toml).
| Entertainment / community | 20.5 h/day service span | 18,317 trips/activity day; 5.5 M access-events/yr | 29,307 trips/activity day; 8.8 M access-events/yr |
304
+
305
+
### Local recirculation of initial CAPEX
306
+
307
+
| Channel | Value | Basis |
308
+
|---|---:|---|
309
+
| CAPEX retained in local procurement / payroll | $480 M | 52% of $918 M CAPEX using bucket local-content shares |
310
+
| Construction-phase local economic activity | $768 M | retained CAPEX × 1.6 local supplier / wage multiplier |
311
+
| Annualised during construction | $77 M / yr | spread across 10 construction / grace years |
312
+
| Construction employment supported | 90,881 job-years | retained CAPEX ÷ (4.0 × median annual income) |
313
+
| Annual paid-trip capacity used in revenue model | 63.1 M - 100.9 M trips/yr | 50%-80% of practical service capacity |
314
+
315
+
_Interpretation: the strongest fiscal result remains the farebox + commercial revenue table above. The broader rows here capture welfare, access, avoided external costs, and local supplier circulation that usually matter to a finance ministry, city authority, or development bank even when they do not appear as railway revenue._
0 commit comments