Code of Conduct
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/metadata-syntax
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
For composite actions, the description key is not strictly required in the action.yml for the composite action to function correctly (see Additional Information for proof).
Instead of Required this should either have an addendum like in the pull request (that is, that description is not required for composite actions, or change Required to optional. In either case, it is probably worth it to state that a description key is highly recommended.
Additional information
I just ran a workflow run that calls a composite action whose action.yml file did not include a description key at the time this workflow ran. The workflow ran as expected (all the composite action does is produce an output that gets passed to the calling workflow).
See https://github.com/mcummings128/gh-actions-outputs-experiments-1/actions/runs/24743176941 for details.
This commit SHA shows the description key was removed from the composite action during the time the workflow ran.
mcummings128/gh-actions-outputs-experiments-1@6037d82
Lastly, please see the pull request this is linked to: #43911
Code of Conduct
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/metadata-syntax
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
For composite actions, the
descriptionkey is not strictly required in theaction.ymlfor the composite action to function correctly (see Additional Information for proof).Instead of Required this should either have an addendum like in the pull request (that is, that
descriptionis not required for composite actions, or change Required to optional. In either case, it is probably worth it to state that adescriptionkey is highly recommended.Additional information
I just ran a workflow run that calls a composite action whose
action.ymlfile did not include a description key at the time this workflow ran. The workflow ran as expected (all the composite action does is produce an output that gets passed to the calling workflow).See https://github.com/mcummings128/gh-actions-outputs-experiments-1/actions/runs/24743176941 for details.
This commit SHA shows the description key was removed from the composite action during the time the workflow ran.
mcummings128/gh-actions-outputs-experiments-1@6037d82
Lastly, please see the pull request this is linked to: #43911