diff --git a/_config.yml b/_config.yml index 227c625..d0899e2 100644 --- a/_config.yml +++ b/_config.yml @@ -24,5 +24,9 @@ collections: group: publications layout: default output: True + reviews: + group: reviews + layout: default + output: True diff --git a/_data/navigation.yml b/_data/navigation.yml index 75b40ee..b730c15 100644 --- a/_data/navigation.yml +++ b/_data/navigation.yml @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ link: "/publications" group: publications -# - name: reviews -# link: "/reviews" -# group: reviews +- name: reviews + link: "/reviews" + group: reviews - name: members link: "/members" diff --git a/_reviews/_template.md.txt b/_reviews/_template.md.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..92b973e --- /dev/null +++ b/_reviews/_template.md.txt @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +--- +title: "Title of Manuscript Reviewed" +date: "YYYY-MM-DD" # Date of Public Review, then update to Date of Publication +authors: "Author1 A, Author2 B, **Barad BA**" # Bold name of lab members by wrapping with ** ** +reviewers: "Reviewer1, Reviewer2" # Lab members who reviewed the manuscript +image: "img/reviews/YYYY_author.webp" # Use CDN! Optional image +abstract: "optional one-sentence abstract" + +peer-review: +- preprint_url: "" # Full URL to the preprint + review_url: "" # Full URL to the public review + +published: +- pmid: "" # PubMed ID of final published version + journal_url: "" # Full URL to the journal version + +# Optional additional links in post-review section +links: +- name: "" # Name of the link + url: "" # URL of the link + +--- + +# Optional: Paste review summary or highlights here diff --git a/reviews/index.html b/reviews/index.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9573a20 --- /dev/null +++ b/reviews/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +--- +title: Peer Reviews from the Barad Lab +layout: parallax +group: reviews +banner: img/site/banners/square_tomo.webp +--- +
+Peer review of scientific manuscripts is essential for scientific communication and plays an important role in refining the body of work prior to final publication. We believe that transparency in peer review can improve the speed, quality, and collegiality of the publication process. Peer review is also an important training opportunity for lab members in scientific thinking and writing. As such, we only review manuscripts that have been posted on preprint servers and we post our peer review comments publicly. +
+ +{% assign sorted = site.reviews | sort: "date" | reverse %} +{% for review in sorted %} + +' | remove: '
' | strip }} +' | remove: '
' | strip }} + {% if review.reviewers %} + Reviewed by: {{ review.reviewers | markdownify | remove: '' | remove: '
' | strip }} + {% if review.date %} - {{ review.date | date: "%B %Y" }}{% endif %} + {% endif %} +{{ review.abstract | markdownify | remove: '
' | remove: '
' }} + {% endif %} +