Skip to content

fix(asf): restore root bypass team#5290

Open
Yicong-Huang wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Yicong-Huang:fix/asf-bypass-teams
Open

fix(asf): restore root bypass team#5290
Yicong-Huang wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Yicong-Huang:fix/asf-bypass-teams

Conversation

@Yicong-Huang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Yicong-Huang Yicong-Huang commented May 29, 2026

What changes were proposed in this PR?

Restore the ASF root team in .asf.yaml branch protection bypasses while keeping texera-committers from #5287. Quote both team names for consistency.

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

Closes #5289
Follow-up to #5287

How was this PR tested?

ruby -e 'require "yaml"; YAML.load_file(".asf.yaml"); puts "YAML OK"'
git diff --check

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

Yes. Used OpenAI Codex.

@Yicong-Huang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cc @Ma77Ball

@Yicong-Huang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Checked other ASF .asf.yaml usages for this follow-up:

  • apache/struts-master uses both "root" and "struts-committers" under bypass_teams, which matches this PR's intended pattern.
  • Many ASF repositories keep root as the default bypass team, e.g. apache/ws-parent, apache/ant, and a broad GitHub code-search sample across ASF repos.

So this PR keeps the ASF infra/root bypass behavior while adding Texera committers for the release-branch workflow introduced in #5287.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented May 29, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.13%. Comparing base (953e2c4) to head (e356175).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #5290      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     49.16%   49.13%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity     2384     2380       -4     
============================================
  Files          1051     1051              
  Lines         40350    40350              
  Branches       4279     4279              
============================================
- Hits          19837    19827      -10     
- Misses        19353    19358       +5     
- Partials       1160     1165       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
access-control-service 41.89% <ø> (ø)
agent-service 33.76% <ø> (ø)
amber 51.62% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
computing-unit-managing-service 0.00% <ø> (ø)
config-service 0.00% <ø> (ø)
file-service 38.42% <ø> (ø)
frontend 41.07% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
python 90.74% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
workflow-compiling-service 56.81% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci changes related to CI fix

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Restore root bypass team for branch protection

2 participants