hi, very sorry for bothering, but I'm quite troubled by this issue.
i was trying to reproduce the results of the paper on imdb dataset., which trained on original train set(ori1.7k) and tested on original validation set is 87.4% while 82.2% on revised validation set.
I used the same setting reported in the paper (if i did not miss something):
- bert-base-uncased
- adam optimizer lr 5e-5
- early stopping on val_loss, 5
- no warmup
- random seed 42
In my experiments, i got 88.7% and 89.1% (82.2% in the paper ) respectively on original validation and revised validation when trained on the original dataset1.7k.
Got 87.3%(80.4% in the paper) and 96.5% (90.8% in the paper) respectively on ori/dev.tsv and revised/dev.tsv when trained on revised/train.tsv.
Could you please guide me to where I should look? I would greatly appreciate your assistance.
hi, very sorry for bothering, but I'm quite troubled by this issue.
i was trying to reproduce the results of the paper on imdb dataset., which trained on original train set(ori1.7k) and tested on original validation set is 87.4% while 82.2% on revised validation set.
I used the same setting reported in the paper (if i did not miss something):
In my experiments, i got 88.7% and 89.1% (82.2% in the paper ) respectively on original validation and revised validation when trained on the original dataset1.7k.
Got 87.3%(80.4% in the paper) and 96.5% (90.8% in the paper) respectively on ori/dev.tsv and revised/dev.tsv when trained on revised/train.tsv.
Could you please guide me to where I should look? I would greatly appreciate your assistance.