Skip to content

Improve on inconsistencies in the 'new' syntax #7132

Description

@shans

(from b/145158983)

There are some awkward 'features' of the new manifest language syntax, a short list are:

  • The differences between directions and fates (i.e. whether to use a verb as a statement e.g. 'create' vs a description e.g. 'consumes')
  • Issues that should be resolved by Slandles (backticks, slot typing)
  • Declarations of recipes, schemas, particles and stores are a totally different format to handles and handle connections
  • The '?' fate doesn't match either the 'no-any' style (where not stating a fate would give it any fate) or the star style (where '*' represents any). In general that there are two styles is unhelpful.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions