Embossed widgets' shadows are incorrect

[noahy-schmid]

Hey, this package is actually amazing, I really like how easy it is to implement neomorphic containers with it. I only think there is a problem with the emboss parameter in the container.
The shadow of an embossed widget actually should blur on the inside of the Container and not on the outside I guess.
I also know this is not implemented natively in flutter, but there could be a workaround for that.

[edeuss]

Yea I have noticed that too @nonoyona @mcaubrey

[MichaelCharles]

Hey there, sorry for the delay in response.

You mean something like this,

Instead of something like this,

Right?

I don't know whether or not I'd call either way right or wrong, but they definitely both have value. If someone can come up with a work around I'd definitely incorporate it as an option at least (or maybe even make it default?).

I tried to put together a workaround the other day and failed. Maybe others will have better luck than me.

[noahy-schmid]

Hey actually I found a way to implement the first version of the panel, but it has a major drawback.
currently, the ClayContainer has the ability to have a CurveType of convex, concave or none.
With my implementation, the CurveType ist restricted to none.

Just tell if you'd like to see my implementation anyways.

[m-j-g]

@nonoyona @mcaubrey this is interesting. (Great job on the package by the way). When I have gone through the documentation of another Neumorphic package I noticed that Emboss wasn't in addition to the curveType but another type itself. In which case @nonoyona solution wouldn't be a drawback. You would just end up with the types of Convex, Concave, Emboss, or None. I'm not sure, though, if people are mixing curve types with emboss.

[wurikiji]

Instead of using emboss: true, using depth: -20 makes ClayContainer more like a reference version but not the same. But, I like this package's approach more 👍

The left one is from the flutter_neumorphic package, and the right one is from this package using depth: -20.

[renanmgs]

This would be awesome, but depth: -20 with Convex shape is a really nice solution too.