Replies: 2 comments
|
Dear @mercerraa
Similarly, you will find mention of the changes in the PS Technical Guidelines in the changelog of the 2024.1 TG release in turn linking for more details the issue #129 in the technical-guidelines repository. |
0 replies
|
Thank you. Wow, this is hard to navigate. Evidently I was looking at the
wrong change log and looking in the wrong discussion.
Den tors 18 apr. 2024 kl 16:20 skrev Stefania Morrone <
***@***.***>:
… Dear @mercerraa <https://github.com/mercerraa>
the mentioned changelog
<https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/application-schemas/releases/tag/2024.1>
briefly summarizes the changes in the Protected Sites (*[ps] - v5.0*)
schema and links to the relevant issues in the issue tracker of the
application-schemas <https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/application-schemas>
repository (below is the screenshot of related rows):
image.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/helpdesk/assets/13329248/3c786851-ca74-48ca-ad4b-ea0569892c5a>
So,
- the changes to the PS data model (and consequently to the associated
schema) originate from the Amendment of the 1089 /2010 (the INSPIRE
Implementing Rules).
- Details of the schema changes can be found in issues #13
<INSPIRE-MIF/application-schemas#13> and #14
<INSPIRE-MIF/application-schemas#14> of the
application-schemas repository.
Similarly, you will find mention of the changes in the PS Technical
Guidelines in the changelog of the 2024.1 TG release
<https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines/releases/tag/v2024.1>
in turn linking for more details the issue #129
<INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines#129> in the
technical-guidelines <https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines>
repository.
The HTML view of the INSPIRE UML models always refers to the latest
version of the data model /schema.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#192 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BH5JCS4JVZMYGQDNOYD5GS3Y57JBPAVCNFSM6AAAAABGNCDOUKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TCNJVG42DK>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I am very new to Inspire and so apoligise if my question is trivial or misplaced.
In version 4 of the ps schema siteDesignation, legalFoundationDate and legalFoundationDocument are siblings, which seems wrong given the UML description of Protected Sites. Version 5 has changed this but I cannot find a reference to this change in the change log.
Have I misunderstood the change log, the schema or both?
All reactions