Skip to content

Clarify node point coordinates are absolute, not room-relative - #357

Merged
DTTerastar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/node-point-absolute
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

Clarify node point coordinates are absolute, not room-relative#357
DTTerastar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/node-point-absolute

Conversation

@DTTerastar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes the wording that caused ESPresense/ESPresense-companion#955 (and duplicates): the Nodes section said point is "x,y,z coordinates within room", but companion treats all coordinates as absolute — z must include the floor's base elevation. Users on multi-story homes who followed the docs got nodes silently excluded from locating and rendered at ground level in the 3D view.

Companion-side warning for this misconfiguration: ESPresense/ESPresense-companion#1635

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01GbJPc22rkttkVsifQgUSbY

Companion issue ESPresense/ESPresense-companion#955: the 'within room'
wording led multi-story users to enter floor-relative z values, which
excludes nodes from locating and renders them at ground level.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GbJPc22rkttkVsifQgUSbY
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@DTTerastar, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 85a4ae2a-6203-4f8f-958f-ef0c02675385

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc835cd and 56cd6b2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/content/docs/companion/configuration.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/node-point-absolute

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying espresense with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 56cd6b2
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://d8099289.espresense.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://docs-node-point-absolute.espresense.pages.dev

View logs

@DTTerastar
DTTerastar merged commit 00f18bf into main Jul 23, 2026
2 checks passed
@DTTerastar
DTTerastar deleted the docs/node-point-absolute branch July 23, 2026 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant