Documentation review: ensure all integrations are documented and deprecated packages are clearly identified

[Stertz]

Documentation review: ensure all integrations are documented and deprecated packages are clearly identified

Description

While adding the SeaweedFS integration, I noticed it wasn't listed in the main README. This made me wonder if there are other integrations that may also be missing from the documentation.

It would be useful to perform a documentation review to ensure the repository stays consistent with the available packages.

Suggested improvements

• Review the README and other documentation to ensure every available integration is listed.
• Identify packages that exist in the repository but are missing from the documentation.
• Clearly indicate integrations that are deprecated (for example, MinIO) so users are aware of their current status before choosing them.

This issue is intended as a general documentation review rather than focusing on a specific integration.

[aaronpowell]

Yeah, there's probably missing ones as it's currently a hand-edited README, which is a PITA.

I've just set Copilot off to make a script to generate that.

As for deprecations, that's generally pretty rare, I think we've only done it for like two integrations so far, so I wouldn't put a huge amount of effort into tackling that problem.