Skip to content

Commit 791032c

Browse files
Copied from api-prototype-6.2.0/meeting-notes
1 parent 9a6593e commit 791032c

1 file changed

Lines changed: 37 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

meeting notes/2016-10-28.md

Lines changed: 37 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
1+
*Oct 28th 2016, 6 PM UTC (9PM Finland, 2PM EST, 11AM PST)*
2+
3+
**Attendees:**
4+
- Intel: [Gabriel Schulhof](https://github.com/gabrielschulhof)
5+
- IBM: [Sampson Gao](https://github.com/sampsongao)
6+
- Microsoft: [Taylor Woll](https://github.com/boingoing), [Arunesh Chandra](https://github.com/aruneshchandra)
7+
8+
**Status Update:**
9+
10+
*IoTivity conversion:*
11+
12+
`node_jsvmapi.h` has confusing comments referring to the need of `napi_set_external_data()` / `napi_get_external_data()`.
13+
This needs to be cleaned up because similar functionality is provided by the following API
14+
15+
`NODE_EXTERN void napi_wrap(napi_env e, napi_value jsObject, void* nativeObj,
16+
napi_destruct* napi_destructor,
17+
napi_weakref* handle);`
18+
19+
*Module Registration for Node v0.10:*
20+
21+
nanomsg is working with v0.10 and v6 without the need to recompile. Investigating a segfault when using it with LevelDown on v0.10
22+
23+
*Port NAPI to Node-ChakraCore using JSRT:*
24+
25+
Indirect dependecies on V8 (e.g buffer) is being shimmed - work almost done. Reviewing if there are any other such depdendencies.
26+
27+
*Perf run on nanomsg benchmark:*
28+
29+
Done! NAPI overhead seems satisfactory. Taylor to share the results by updating [#8](https://github.com/nodejs/abi-stable-node/issues/8)
30+
31+
*Current known work items*
32+
33+
Filed all the current known work items as issues in the abi-stable-node repo
34+
35+
*NodeInteractive Demo*
36+
37+
Started looking into [Leveldown electron demo](https://github.com/Level/electron-demo), working through build issues.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)