Minimal changes

Author: lorenzotomada

docs/Documentation.ipynb

@@ -746,6 +746,8 @@
     "Profiling is performed using the `submit.sh` file in the `shell` folder, which internally \n",
     "We begin by discussing the memory consumption of the method, studying how it varies with respect to the matrix size and number of processes, and comparing it to `numpy`'s and `scipy`'s `eig` built-in function.\n",
     "\n",
+    "*IMPORTANT*: please notice that we did not use `scipy.sparse`'s solver as it cannot be used to retrieve all the eigenvalues, which would have make the comparison unfair.\n",
+    "\n",
     "![Memory profiling](plots/memory_profiling.png)\n",
     "\n",
     "It is possible to see that cumulative memory consumption does not really depend on the number of processes, and that for low values of $n$ it behaves better than `numpy` and `scipy`, while performance degradates for high values of $n$.\n",

experiments/config.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-dim: 200
+dim: 500
 density: 0.1
 n_processes: 2
 plot: false

shell/submit.sh

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #!/bin/bash
 
 # Ranges over which we iterate
-n_processes=(2 4 8)
+n_processes=(1 2 4 8)
 matrix_sizes=(10 50 100 500 1000 1500)
 
 last_dim="${matrix_sizes[-1]}"