Opinionated html language value. #127
Replies: 5 comments 7 replies
-
|
I /think/ I merged some change that was replacing the UK verbiage to US one, but I'm not totally sure. You seem to have access to bigger tool than me. Personally I would like to keep the intial spirit, so it would be great to know where we stand right now. Do you think it would be possible to get us a rough idea of where we stand currently? Like how many mistake we have in us english vs uk english? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I personally don't see a strong reason to change the current value, but I'm not against making it more specific. I believe |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My IDE does show natural language grammar issues. I'm battling with it to show me issues when it is set to From a cursory look, it seems that the content as a whole is mainly USA in feel but it isn't consistent, e.g. I'll have more information soon... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
OK, the content is definitely American English. I suggest we set the Should I submit a PR for this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Do we have an opinion on the site's locale value? Currently, the html is declared with 'lang="en"', which is generic.
Perhaps we should pick a more specific 'en-GB' or 'en-US' value, thus allowing us to pick up more grammatical issues. Currently there's some abiguity, for example, should we be using 'license' or 'licence'.
It's not a big issue, but my IDE's grammar checker is complaining, I like to keep it happy.
A consistent locale seems like a sensible idea.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions