Skip to content

[Repo Assist] Add AsyncSeq.findIndex, tryFindIndex, findIndexAsync, tryFindIndexAsync, sortWith #141

[Repo Assist] Add AsyncSeq.findIndex, tryFindIndex, findIndexAsync, tryFindIndexAsync, sortWith

[Repo Assist] Add AsyncSeq.findIndex, tryFindIndex, findIndexAsync, tryFindIndexAsync, sortWith #141

Triggered via pull request March 1, 2026 17:10
Status Success
Total duration 1m 29s
Artifacts

pull-request.yml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

4 warnings
build: tests/FSharp.Control.AsyncSeq.Tests/AsyncSeqTests.fs#L2012
The result of groupBy must be consumed with a parallel combinator such as AsyncSeq.mapAsyncParallel. Sequential consumption will deadlock because sub-sequence completion depends on other sub-sequences being consumed concurrently.
build: tests/FSharp.Control.AsyncSeq.Tests/AsyncSeqTests.fs#L2003
The result of groupBy must be consumed with a parallel combinator such as AsyncSeq.mapAsyncParallel. Sequential consumption will deadlock because sub-sequence completion depends on other sub-sequences being consumed concurrently.
build: src/FSharp.Control.AsyncSeq/AsyncSeq.fs#L2293
The result of groupByAsync must be consumed with a parallel combinator such as AsyncSeq.mapAsyncParallel. Sequential consumption will deadlock because sub-sequence completion depends on other sub-sequences being consumed concurrently.
build: src/FSharp.Control.AsyncSeq/AsyncSeq.fs#L2293
The result of groupByAsync must be consumed with a parallel combinator such as AsyncSeq.mapAsyncParallel. Sequential consumption will deadlock because sub-sequence completion depends on other sub-sequences being consumed concurrently.