In the Guide for open standards, it would be good to link directly to the TBS definition of "open standard".
I tried to chase down the definition, in the various references given, but was unable to. I was looking for some key phrases like "royalty-free", etc.
Unlike the term "open source", there isn't a completely clear, widely agreed-on definition of "open standard" (although the definition of "open standard" given by the Open Source Initiative is good and is maybe the closest thing we have to a formal definition of the term -- see also additional commentary re "FRAND" here). Thus the importance both of linking to the TBS definition, if there is one, and of ensuring that that definition is a solid one that allows unrestricted, non-monopolized, royalty-free implementation in open source software.
(I think issue #25 may be related to this, though it's not exactly the same.)
In the Guide for open standards, it would be good to link directly to the TBS definition of "open standard".
I tried to chase down the definition, in the various references given, but was unable to. I was looking for some key phrases like "royalty-free", etc.
Unlike the term "open source", there isn't a completely clear, widely agreed-on definition of "open standard" (although the definition of "open standard" given by the Open Source Initiative is good and is maybe the closest thing we have to a formal definition of the term -- see also additional commentary re "FRAND" here). Thus the importance both of linking to the TBS definition, if there is one, and of ensuring that that definition is a solid one that allows unrestricted, non-monopolized, royalty-free implementation in open source software.
(I think issue #25 may be related to this, though it's not exactly the same.)