9p/trans_fd: p9_fd_request: kick rx thread if EPOLLIN

p9_read_work() doesn't set Rworksched and doesn't do schedule_work(m->rq)
if list_empty(&m->req_list).

However, if the pipe is full, we need to read more data and this used to
work prior to commit aaec5a9 ("pipe_read: don't wake up the writer
if the pipe is still full").

p9_read_work() does p9_fd_read() -> ... -> anon_pipe_read() which (before
the commit above) triggered the unnecessary wakeup. This wakeup calls
p9_pollwake() which kicks p9_poll_workfn() -> p9_poll_mux(), p9_poll_mux()
will notice EPOLLIN and schedule_work(&m->rq).

This no longer happens after the optimization above, change p9_fd_request()
to use p9_poll_mux() instead of only checking for EPOLLOUT.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Tested-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Co-developed-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>

Author: oleg-nesterov

net/9p/trans_fd.c

@@ -666,7 +666,6 @@ static void p9_poll_mux(struct p9_conn *m)
 
 static int p9_fd_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 {
-	__poll_t n;
 	int err;
 	struct p9_trans_fd *ts = client->trans;
 	struct p9_conn *m = &ts->conn;
@@ -686,13 +685,7 @@ static int p9_fd_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 	list_add_tail(&req->req_list, &m->unsent_req_list);
 	spin_unlock(&m->req_lock);
 
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(Wpending, &m->wsched))
-		n = EPOLLOUT;
-	else
-		n = p9_fd_poll(m->client, NULL, NULL);
-
-	if (n & EPOLLOUT && !test_and_set_bit(Wworksched, &m->wsched))
-		schedule_work(&m->wq);
+	p9_poll_mux(m);
 
 	return 0;
 }