Skip to content

Commit 72105fc

Browse files
DispatchCodeAlexander Gordeev
authored andcommitted
s390: Replace use of system_wq with system_dfl_wq
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API. system_wq is a per-CPU worqueue (replaced by system_percpu_wq), but the current code does not benefit from it. Because of that, system_wq has been replaced by system_dfl_wq, the new unbound workqueue. The old wq will be kept for a few release cylces. Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <[email protected]> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mete Durlu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
1 parent dbfe205 commit 72105fc

1 file changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion

File tree

arch/s390/kernel/hiperdispatch.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int hd_enable_hiperdispatch(void)
191191
return 0;
192192
if (hd_online_cores <= hd_entitled_cores)
193193
return 0;
194-
mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &hd_capacity_work, HD_DELAY_INTERVAL * hd_delay_factor);
194+
mod_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, &hd_capacity_work, HD_DELAY_INTERVAL * hd_delay_factor);
195195
hd_update_capacities();
196196
return 1;
197197
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)